Assessing and Clearing the Cervical Spine

Authors: Jules Blackham, Jason M Kendall, Roland Watura / Editor:  Jason B Lee / Reviewer: Emma Everett / Codes: PP7, T1Published: 03/11/2017

Description:

Cervical spine immobilisation is the most commonly performed procedure in pre-hospital care; it is not benign: it is associated with raised intracranial pressure in patients with head injury, pressure sores and impairment of respiratory function. Reliable and expedient strategies, clinical and/or radiological are required to exclude significant cervical spine injury.

After completing this session you will be able to:

  • Describe the pathophysiology of cervical spine injury
  • Link mechanism of injury to anatomical injury
  • Perform a clinical assessment to exclude significant cervical spine injury
  • Use appropriate clinical decision rules to exclude significant injury
  • Recognise when radiological imaging is required to exclude significant injury
  • Plan an appropriate imaging strategy for an individual patient
  • Manage a patient with a potential cervical spine injury

References:

  1. Milby AH,Halpern CH, Guo W et al. Prevalence of cervical spinal injury in trauma. Neurosurgical Focus 2008;25(5):E10.
  2. Benger J, Blackham J. Why do we put cervical collars on conscious trauma patients? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009;17:44.
  3. Greaves I, Porter K, Garner J. Trauma Care Manual. 2nd edn. Hodder and Arnold, 2009. Chapter 12.
  4. Slack SE, Clancy MJ. Clearing the cervical spine of paediatric trauma patients. Emerg Med J 2004;21:189-193.
  5. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 2001;343:94-9.
  6. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001;286(15):1841-8.
  7. Dickinson G, Stiell IG, Schull M et al. Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments.  Ann Emerg Med 2004;43(4):507-14.
  8. Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD et al. The Canadian C-Spine Rule versus the NEXUS Low-Risk Criteria in Patients with Trauma. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2510-2518.
  9. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD et al. A Prospective Multicenter Study of Cervical Spine Injury in Children. Pediatrics 2001;108:e20-20.
  10. Ehrlich PF, Wee C, Drongowski R et al. Canadian C-spine Rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Low-Risk Criteria for C-spine radiography in young trauma patients. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2009;44(5):987-691.
  11. Blackham J, Benger J. Clearing the cervical spine in conscious trauma patients. Trauma 2009;11(2):93-109.
  12. Swischuk LE, John SD, Hendrick EP. Is the open-mouth odontoid view necessary in children under 5 years? Pediatric Radiology 2000;30:186-189.
  13. Pollack CV Jr, Hendey GW, Martin DR et al. Use of flexion-extension radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2001;38(1):8-11.
  14. Marion DW, Domeier R, Dunham CM et al. Practice management guidelines for identifying cervical spine injuries following trauma Update  EAST Practice Parameter Workgroup for Cervical Spine Clearance 2001.
  15. Ptak T, Kihiczak D, Lawrason JN et al. Screening for cervical spine trauma with helical CT: Experience with 676 cases. Emergency Radiology 2001;8(6):315-9.
  16. Benzel EC, Hart BL, Ball PA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of patients with occult cervical spine injury. Journal of Neurosurgery 1996;85(5):824-9.
  17. Como JJ, Diaz JJ, Dunham CM et al. Practice management guidelines for identification of cervical spine injuries following trauma – update from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Practice Management Guidelines Committee 2009.
  18. Davis JW, Kaups KL, Cunningham MA et al. Routine evaluation of the cervical spine in head-injured patients with dynamic fluroscopy: a reapprasial. Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care 2001;50(6):1044-1047.
  19. Verhagen AP, Scholtne-Peeters G GGM, Van Wijngaarden S et al. Conservative Treatments of whiplash. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, 2009.
  20. Ct P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L et al. A Systematic Review of the Prognosis of Acute Whiplash and a New Conceptual Framework to Synthesize the Literature. Spine 2001;26(19):E445-E458.
  21. Bandiera G, Stiell IG, Wells GA et al. The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42(3):395-402.

Leave a Reply